<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 96 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56112</link>
    <description>A customary transfer of jewellery by a father-in-law to his daughter-in-law on the occasion of the son&#039;s marriage was treated as non-voluntary because it was made in accordance with community custom and social obligation. The reasoning held that where a transfer is compelled by a moral, social or customary duty, it does not amount to a gift. On that basis, the transfer fell outside the definition of &quot;gift&quot; under the Gift-tax Act and was not chargeable to gift-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:23:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 96 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56112</link>
      <description>A customary transfer of jewellery by a father-in-law to his daughter-in-law on the occasion of the son&#039;s marriage was treated as non-voluntary because it was made in accordance with community custom and social obligation. The reasoning held that where a transfer is compelled by a moral, social or customary duty, it does not amount to a gift. On that basis, the transfer fell outside the definition of &quot;gift&quot; under the Gift-tax Act and was not chargeable to gift-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>