<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 183 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56102</link>
    <description>For surtax computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, capital is determined only under the Second Schedule, and reserves may be reduced only in the specific situations that Schedule expressly permits. A general reserve shown in the balance sheet could not be reduced merely because depreciation allowed under the Income-tax Act exceeded depreciation provided in the books. The lower assessed profits, by themselves, did not justify a capital adjustment where no express statutory basis existed. A reserve created out of post-tax profits remained includible in capital, and the assessee&#039;s computation was therefore correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 183 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56102</link>
      <description>For surtax computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, capital is determined only under the Second Schedule, and reserves may be reduced only in the specific situations that Schedule expressly permits. A general reserve shown in the balance sheet could not be reduced merely because depreciation allowed under the Income-tax Act exceeded depreciation provided in the books. The lower assessed profits, by themselves, did not justify a capital adjustment where no express statutory basis existed. A reserve created out of post-tax profits remained includible in capital, and the assessee&#039;s computation was therefore correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>