<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 87 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56072</link>
    <description>A compromise settlement involving waiver of a co-operative housing society&#039;s claim was not a taxable gift or deemed gift by the assessee-company. The release of liability formed part of a genuine dispute settlement, with consideration moving under the broader compromise, so it could not be treated as absent merely because it was indirect or routed through a third party. The statutory deeming rule under section 4(1)(c) of the Gift-tax Act applied only where the discharge was not bona fide to the satisfaction of the Gift-tax Officer, and the society, as a separate entity, was the one empowered to release its own claim. The addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 87 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56072</link>
      <description>A compromise settlement involving waiver of a co-operative housing society&#039;s claim was not a taxable gift or deemed gift by the assessee-company. The release of liability formed part of a genuine dispute settlement, with consideration moving under the broader compromise, so it could not be treated as absent merely because it was indirect or routed through a third party. The statutory deeming rule under section 4(1)(c) of the Gift-tax Act applied only where the discharge was not bona fide to the satisfaction of the Gift-tax Officer, and the society, as a separate entity, was the one empowered to release its own claim. The addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>