<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 68 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56052</link>
    <description>Reassessment of gift-tax valuation was held invalid where it was founded on a revenue audit objection and a different method of valuing unquoted shares. The prevailing Board circular for the relevant year governed the original assessment, and a later revision could not be applied retrospectively to withdraw that benefit. The audit note expressed only a view on the legal position and did not amount to &quot;information&quot; for reopening under section 16(1)(b). Reopening based on a new valuation approach that would merely increase tax was treated as a change of opinion. Goodwill arising after the relevant valuation date also could not be included to enhance share value, so the reassessment was annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 68 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56052</link>
      <description>Reassessment of gift-tax valuation was held invalid where it was founded on a revenue audit objection and a different method of valuing unquoted shares. The prevailing Board circular for the relevant year governed the original assessment, and a later revision could not be applied retrospectively to withdraw that benefit. The audit note expressed only a view on the legal position and did not amount to &quot;information&quot; for reopening under section 16(1)(b). Reopening based on a new valuation approach that would merely increase tax was treated as a change of opinion. Goodwill arising after the relevant valuation date also could not be included to enhance share value, so the reassessment was annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>