<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56049</link>
    <description>Interest on a Non-resident (External) Account was held taxable because the exemption under section 10(4A) applied only to a non-resident, not to a person resident but not ordinarily resident. The distinction between &quot;non-resident&quot; under section 2(30) and the separate residency category under section 6(6) meant the statutory exemption ceased once the assessee was no longer non-resident. Hardship, promissory estoppel, and RBI circulars could not enlarge the clear language of the Income-tax Act, and foreign exchange instructions could not control tax liability. The later Finance Act, 1982 amendment confirmed that the earlier provision did not extend to resident but not ordinarily resident persons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56049</link>
      <description>Interest on a Non-resident (External) Account was held taxable because the exemption under section 10(4A) applied only to a non-resident, not to a person resident but not ordinarily resident. The distinction between &quot;non-resident&quot; under section 2(30) and the separate residency category under section 6(6) meant the statutory exemption ceased once the assessee was no longer non-resident. Hardship, promissory estoppel, and RBI circulars could not enlarge the clear language of the Income-tax Act, and foreign exchange instructions could not control tax liability. The later Finance Act, 1982 amendment confirmed that the earlier provision did not extend to resident but not ordinarily resident persons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>