<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 68 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56047</link>
    <description>The appeals partly succeeded as the Tribunal upheld the penalties but limited them to 10 percent of the difference between the assessed tax and the tax demanded under section 210. The estimates filed were deemed invalid for not complying with sub-section (3A) of section 212 due to late filing and insufficient tax difference. The Tribunal dismissed arguments based on judicial precedents and explanations for the default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 68 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56047</link>
      <description>The appeals partly succeeded as the Tribunal upheld the penalties but limited them to 10 percent of the difference between the assessed tax and the tax demanded under section 210. The estimates filed were deemed invalid for not complying with sub-section (3A) of section 212 due to late filing and insufficient tax difference. The Tribunal dismissed arguments based on judicial precedents and explanations for the default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>