<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 189 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the deletion of the disallowance of interest expenses by the CIT(A) for being genuine business transactions not violating relevant laws. The Tribunal remanded the issue of inflated purchases back to the Assessing Officer for factual verification regarding the discrepancy, as explained by the CIT(A) due to share transfer stamp charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 189 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the deletion of the disallowance of interest expenses by the CIT(A) for being genuine business transactions not violating relevant laws. The Tribunal remanded the issue of inflated purchases back to the Assessing Officer for factual verification regarding the discrepancy, as explained by the CIT(A) due to share transfer stamp charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>