<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 192 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was unwarranted as the assessee voluntarily disclosed additional income without any intention to conceal. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 80,640 was deleted, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 192 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was unwarranted as the assessee voluntarily disclosed additional income without any intention to conceal. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 80,640 was deleted, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>