<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 290 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made for non-compete allowance in income tax assessment for multiple years. The Tribunal held that the non-compete allowance was a capital receipt not liable to income tax, emphasizing the capital nature of receipts related to restrictive covenants. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, with the Tribunal relying on judicial precedents and amendments in the IT Act to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 290 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made for non-compete allowance in income tax assessment for multiple years. The Tribunal held that the non-compete allowance was a capital receipt not liable to income tax, emphasizing the capital nature of receipts related to restrictive covenants. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, with the Tribunal relying on judicial precedents and amendments in the IT Act to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>