<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 258 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56012</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals by the assessee, ruling in their favor on the issues of TDS demand and interest levied. The ITAT disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directed the AO to treat the supply of printing and packing material as a contract for sale, not subject to TDS. Consequently, the interest levied on the failure to deduct TDS on purchases of preprinted packing material was also set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 258 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56012</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals by the assessee, ruling in their favor on the issues of TDS demand and interest levied. The ITAT disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directed the AO to treat the supply of printing and packing material as a contract for sale, not subject to TDS. Consequently, the interest levied on the failure to deduct TDS on purchases of preprinted packing material was also set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>