<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 382 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56008</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the reassessment notices under s. 148, deeming them invalid due to improper DVO references without pending proceedings, as per s. 142A limitations. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, invalidating the assessments and rendering arguments on undisclosed investments moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 382 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56008</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the reassessment notices under s. 148, deeming them invalid due to improper DVO references without pending proceedings, as per s. 142A limitations. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, invalidating the assessments and rendering arguments on undisclosed investments moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>