<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 101 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56003</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, granting relief on the issues of revenue expenditure, lease rent, and sales promotion expenses. The bad debt claim was partly allowed and partly remanded for further verification. The deduction under s. 80HH was dismissed as not pressed, and the interest under s. 234B was to be adjusted consequentially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:49:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 101 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56003</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, granting relief on the issues of revenue expenditure, lease rent, and sales promotion expenses. The bad debt claim was partly allowed and partly remanded for further verification. The deduction under s. 80HH was dismissed as not pressed, and the interest under s. 234B was to be adjusted consequentially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>