<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 106 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under section 40A(3) of the IT Act. It was found that the cash payments made by the assessee for purchasing ghee were genuine and justified under rule 6DD(j). The judgment emphasized the need to consider business expediency and genuine difficulties faced by the payee in assessing the validity of cash transactions under section 40A(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:40:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 106 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under section 40A(3) of the IT Act. It was found that the cash payments made by the assessee for purchasing ghee were genuine and justified under rule 6DD(j). The judgment emphasized the need to consider business expediency and genuine difficulties faced by the payee in assessing the validity of cash transactions under section 40A(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>