<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55992</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation on plant and machinery, citing precedents supporting trial production as usage. The tribunal upheld the referral of expenditure issues back to the AO due to insufficient reasoning for disallowance. Regarding interest under section 215, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, disagreeing with the CIT(A) and citing judgments to support the decision that the assessee was not liable for interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:22:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55992</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation on plant and machinery, citing precedents supporting trial production as usage. The tribunal upheld the referral of expenditure issues back to the AO due to insufficient reasoning for disallowance. Regarding interest under section 215, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, disagreeing with the CIT(A) and citing judgments to support the decision that the assessee was not liable for interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>