<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It held that the assessee was entitled to depreciation amounting to Rs. 11,60,300 and that lease rent of Rs. 1,80,000 should be included in the assessee&#039;s income. However, the disallowance of Rs. 11,000 from the claimed professional fees of Rs. 21,000 was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It held that the assessee was entitled to depreciation amounting to Rs. 11,60,300 and that lease rent of Rs. 1,80,000 should be included in the assessee&#039;s income. However, the disallowance of Rs. 11,000 from the claimed professional fees of Rs. 21,000 was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>