<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 120 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing departmental appeals and confirming the application of the Amnesty Scheme. All additions by the AO were deleted, including estimated business income, low withdrawals for household expenses, interest income on fixed deposits, marriage expenses, purchase of a shop, and advances made by the assessee. The cross-objections were deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 120 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing departmental appeals and confirming the application of the Amnesty Scheme. All additions by the AO were deleted, including estimated business income, low withdrawals for household expenses, interest income on fixed deposits, marriage expenses, purchase of a shop, and advances made by the assessee. The cross-objections were deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>