<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 54 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of interest paid on a cash credit account with Bank of Baroda. The Tribunal found no direct correlation between the borrowed funds and advances to a sister concern, emphasizing that as long as borrowed capital is for business purposes, the specific application is immaterial. Consequently, the sustained disallowance was canceled, and the full interest amount was allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 54 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of interest paid on a cash credit account with Bank of Baroda. The Tribunal found no direct correlation between the borrowed funds and advances to a sister concern, emphasizing that as long as borrowed capital is for business purposes, the specific application is immaterial. Consequently, the sustained disallowance was canceled, and the full interest amount was allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>