<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 95 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 2,500 to the profits was deleted based on precedent, while the disallowance of Rs. 630 on stamp paper expenses was dismissed. However, the claim for relief under Section 80J was denied as the assessee did not meet the requirement of employing 10 or more workers as per Section 80J(4)(iv).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 95 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 2,500 to the profits was deleted based on precedent, while the disallowance of Rs. 630 on stamp paper expenses was dismissed. However, the claim for relief under Section 80J was denied as the assessee did not meet the requirement of employing 10 or more workers as per Section 80J(4)(iv).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>