<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 100 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the Annual Letting Value (ALV) of Rs. 45,000 for each bungalow after deductions, despite the firm&#039;s dissolution reducing the value by Rs. 5,000. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the depreciation claim on the vehicle, emphasizing that registration was not a determining factor for depreciation eligibility, contrary to the Income Tax Officer&#039;s disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 100 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the Annual Letting Value (ALV) of Rs. 45,000 for each bungalow after deductions, despite the firm&#039;s dissolution reducing the value by Rs. 5,000. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the depreciation claim on the vehicle, emphasizing that registration was not a determining factor for depreciation eligibility, contrary to the Income Tax Officer&#039;s disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>