<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 139 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55924</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed in the case involving various tax issues such as depreciation, investment allowance, revaluation of closing stock, bonus payments, and allowances. The Tribunal upheld certain decisions made by the CIT(A) and ITO, emphasizing adherence to legal principles and precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for each issue addressed in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 139 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55924</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed in the case involving various tax issues such as depreciation, investment allowance, revaluation of closing stock, bonus payments, and allowances. The Tribunal upheld certain decisions made by the CIT(A) and ITO, emphasizing adherence to legal principles and precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for each issue addressed in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>