<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 89 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. It concluded that the appellant had successfully demonstrated the absence of fraud or willful neglect in disclosing income, citing the appellant&#039;s submission of relevant documents and explanations as evidence of good faith. The Tribunal emphasized the penal nature of the provision and the need for a clear finding on the imposition of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 89 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. It concluded that the appellant had successfully demonstrated the absence of fraud or willful neglect in disclosing income, citing the appellant&#039;s submission of relevant documents and explanations as evidence of good faith. The Tribunal emphasized the penal nature of the provision and the need for a clear finding on the imposition of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>