<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the land transferred by the assessee to the partnership firm was held as stock-in-trade, not as a capital asset. Therefore, the provisions of Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act were not applicable, and no capital gains tax liability arose from the transaction. The appeal was partly allowed, directing the Income Tax Officer to adjust the assessment accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:11:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the land transferred by the assessee to the partnership firm was held as stock-in-trade, not as a capital asset. Therefore, the provisions of Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act were not applicable, and no capital gains tax liability arose from the transaction. The appeal was partly allowed, directing the Income Tax Officer to adjust the assessment accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>