<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55873</link>
    <description>In valuing a partner&#039;s interest in a firm for wealth-tax purposes, exemptions available to the firm under section 5 must first be applied while determining the firm&#039;s net wealth under section 4(1)(b) read with Rule 2. The partner&#039;s share is then computed on that reduced net wealth, so exempt assets such as gold bonds, securities and shares are not included again in the partner&#039;s valuation. The Tribunal followed its earlier view and the Gujarat High Court&#039;s approach, treating the exemption as operative at the firm level rather than only at the partner level, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:48:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 81 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55873</link>
      <description>In valuing a partner&#039;s interest in a firm for wealth-tax purposes, exemptions available to the firm under section 5 must first be applied while determining the firm&#039;s net wealth under section 4(1)(b) read with Rule 2. The partner&#039;s share is then computed on that reduced net wealth, so exempt assets such as gold bonds, securities and shares are not included again in the partner&#039;s valuation. The Tribunal followed its earlier view and the Gujarat High Court&#039;s approach, treating the exemption as operative at the firm level rather than only at the partner level, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>