<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 67 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the investment allowance claim for a public limited company engaged in the hotel business. The decision was based on the finding that hotel businesses, primarily involved in trading activities and food preparation, do not qualify as industrial undertakings for investment allowance purposes under section 32A of the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized that activities like preparing food do not amount to manufacturing or processing goods, as required for investment allowance eligibility. Previous court decisions and interpretations supported this conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 67 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the investment allowance claim for a public limited company engaged in the hotel business. The decision was based on the finding that hotel businesses, primarily involved in trading activities and food preparation, do not qualify as industrial undertakings for investment allowance purposes under section 32A of the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized that activities like preparing food do not amount to manufacturing or processing goods, as required for investment allowance eligibility. Previous court decisions and interpretations supported this conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>