<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55847</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee for the delay in filing the return of income under section 271(1)(a), confirming the decisions of the ITO and AAC. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide evidence for the delay and did not make efforts to pay the tax, indicating a conscious disregard of obligations. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory requirements under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55847</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee for the delay in filing the return of income under section 271(1)(a), confirming the decisions of the ITO and AAC. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide evidence for the delay and did not make efforts to pay the tax, indicating a conscious disregard of obligations. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory requirements under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>