<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 86 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment initiated by the Revenue concerning the valuation of shares received as a donation by the assessee trust for the assessment year 1973-74. It was held that the ITO exceeded his authority in altering the share value and computing capital gains based on an Audit Party note, which misinterpreted the correct valuation method under the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to proper legal provisions in valuing assets for charitable trusts and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that a mere difference in opinion does not justify reopening the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 86 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment initiated by the Revenue concerning the valuation of shares received as a donation by the assessee trust for the assessment year 1973-74. It was held that the ITO exceeded his authority in altering the share value and computing capital gains based on an Audit Party note, which misinterpreted the correct valuation method under the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to proper legal provisions in valuing assets for charitable trusts and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that a mere difference in opinion does not justify reopening the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>