<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 107 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction of gratuity based on actuarial valuation, stating that the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting and had no provision for gratuity, thus unaffected by Section 40A(7). The Tribunal emphasized that gratuity payment liability was statutory under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and accrued under the mercantile system. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the deduction of gratuity liability was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 107 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction of gratuity based on actuarial valuation, stating that the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting and had no provision for gratuity, thus unaffected by Section 40A(7). The Tribunal emphasized that gratuity payment liability was statutory under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and accrued under the mercantile system. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the deduction of gratuity liability was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>