<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the female assessee, holding that the exemption under section 5(1)(ix) of the GT Act applies to both males and females. It emphasized that parents have a legal duty to support their minor children, allowing the mother to claim the exemption based on the child&#039;s dependency on her.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:50:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the female assessee, holding that the exemption under section 5(1)(ix) of the GT Act applies to both males and females. It emphasized that parents have a legal duty to support their minor children, allowing the mother to claim the exemption based on the child&#039;s dependency on her.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>