<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55817</link>
    <description>Section 5(1)(ix) of the Gift-tax Act was construed as gender-neutral, because the reference to &quot;his wife&quot; did not justify limiting the exemption to male donors where the statutory context and the General Clauses Act permitted an inclusive reading of &quot;person&quot;. The interpretation preferred avoided sex-based discrimination, and the exemption was held available to a female donor as well. The dependency condition for a minor donee was also satisfied, since both parents have a legal duty to maintain a minor and the record affirmed the child&#039;s dependence on the assessee without denial. On that basis, the exemption applied and the addition could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:50:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 88 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55817</link>
      <description>Section 5(1)(ix) of the Gift-tax Act was construed as gender-neutral, because the reference to &quot;his wife&quot; did not justify limiting the exemption to male donors where the statutory context and the General Clauses Act permitted an inclusive reading of &quot;person&quot;. The interpretation preferred avoided sex-based discrimination, and the exemption was held available to a female donor as well. The dependency condition for a minor donee was also satisfied, since both parents have a legal duty to maintain a minor and the record affirmed the child&#039;s dependence on the assessee without denial. On that basis, the exemption applied and the addition could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>