<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 40 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55808</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty imposition of Rs. 3,000 under s. 273(c) of the Act was not justified as the Income-tax Officer did not express satisfaction of the default. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 40 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55808</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty imposition of Rs. 3,000 under s. 273(c) of the Act was not justified as the Income-tax Officer did not express satisfaction of the default. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>