<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 293 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55793</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the retrospective amendment to section 158B(b) justified the additions for alleged bogus purchases during the block assessment period. It was determined that the ITAT retained the authority to rectify its order under section 254(2) despite the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal. The revenue&#039;s miscellaneous applications were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 293 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55793</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the retrospective amendment to section 158B(b) justified the additions for alleged bogus purchases during the block assessment period. It was determined that the ITAT retained the authority to rectify its order under section 254(2) despite the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal. The revenue&#039;s miscellaneous applications were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>