<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 82 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55756</link>
    <description>A transfer of land at consideration substantially below market value may be treated as a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act when no adequate non-monetary or bona fide explanation is shown. Adequacy of consideration is assessed in a broader sense, not by price difference alone, and surrounding circumstances remain relevant. For valuation, a proximate actual sale instance may be preferred over a residue-based estimation method where the comparable transaction is reliable. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the comparable-sale valuation, and the lower rate adopted was upheld; proceedings in other tax contexts were held irrelevant to the gift-tax valuation exercise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 82 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55756</link>
      <description>A transfer of land at consideration substantially below market value may be treated as a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act when no adequate non-monetary or bona fide explanation is shown. Adequacy of consideration is assessed in a broader sense, not by price difference alone, and surrounding circumstances remain relevant. For valuation, a proximate actual sale instance may be preferred over a residue-based estimation method where the comparable transaction is reliable. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the comparable-sale valuation, and the lower rate adopted was upheld; proceedings in other tax contexts were held irrelevant to the gift-tax valuation exercise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>