<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 54 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55690</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, holding that the Director of Income-tax (Exemption) had the jurisdiction to invoke section 263 of the Income-tax Act. However, it determined that the assessment order could not be revised based on a change of opinion. Additionally, the tribunal concluded that the leasing, development, and sale of flats were deemed charitable activities rather than business ventures, and thus, the provisions of section 11(4A) were not applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 54 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55690</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, holding that the Director of Income-tax (Exemption) had the jurisdiction to invoke section 263 of the Income-tax Act. However, it determined that the assessment order could not be revised based on a change of opinion. Additionally, the tribunal concluded that the leasing, development, and sale of flats were deemed charitable activities rather than business ventures, and thus, the provisions of section 11(4A) were not applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>