<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 121 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction claim regarding the income-tax liability of a dissolved firm, emphasizing that the discharged liability formed part of the capital consideration for taking over the business. The Tribunal rejected arguments based on other legal precedents and affirmed that the liability discharge did not qualify for a revenue deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:23:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 121 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction claim regarding the income-tax liability of a dissolved firm, emphasizing that the discharged liability formed part of the capital consideration for taking over the business. The Tribunal rejected arguments based on other legal precedents and affirmed that the liability discharge did not qualify for a revenue deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>