<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 99 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, granting them the depreciation allowance for the full year. The decision was based on the interpretation of ownership, usage, and the definition of &#039;transfer&#039; in the context of asset allocation post-dissolution, aligning with previous judicial precedents and statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:02:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 99 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, granting them the depreciation allowance for the full year. The decision was based on the interpretation of ownership, usage, and the definition of &#039;transfer&#039; in the context of asset allocation post-dissolution, aligning with previous judicial precedents and statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>