<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 138 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55638</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation and investment allowance on the capitalised expenditure for technical fees. Additionally, the royalty payment was treated as revenue expenditure. The judgment highlighted the interconnected nature of the licence and know-how in the collaboration agreement and examined the agreement&#039;s terms to determine the payment&#039;s nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 138 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55638</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation and investment allowance on the capitalised expenditure for technical fees. Additionally, the royalty payment was treated as revenue expenditure. The judgment highlighted the interconnected nature of the licence and know-how in the collaboration agreement and examined the agreement&#039;s terms to determine the payment&#039;s nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>