<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 75 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55598</link>
    <description>Additional remuneration and rent-free accommodation perquisites for a managing director and whole-time director do not accrue in the accounting year unless the required Central Government approval is obtained within that year. The approval requirement operates as a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the remuneration increase and related appointment amendments, so a later sanction cannot create an accrued liability retrospectively. The distinction drawn from earlier Supreme Court authority was treated as immaterial because the governing provisions imposed the same restriction on legal effectiveness pending approval. The disallowance of the claimed deduction was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 75 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55598</link>
      <description>Additional remuneration and rent-free accommodation perquisites for a managing director and whole-time director do not accrue in the accounting year unless the required Central Government approval is obtained within that year. The approval requirement operates as a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the remuneration increase and related appointment amendments, so a later sanction cannot create an accrued liability retrospectively. The distinction drawn from earlier Supreme Court authority was treated as immaterial because the governing provisions imposed the same restriction on legal effectiveness pending approval. The disallowance of the claimed deduction was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>