<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 201 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55592</link>
    <description>Compensation received on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was treated as outside capital gains because the land was not a capital asset on the relevant transfer date. The analysis applied the statutory definition of capital asset together with the deeming rule for compulsory acquisition, and held that the operative date was the date linked to the acquisition process, not the later date of enhanced compensation. A subsequent notification bringing Kalol within a specified urban area could not change the land&#039;s character retrospectively. The compensation and solatium were therefore not taxable as capital gains, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 201 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55592</link>
      <description>Compensation received on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was treated as outside capital gains because the land was not a capital asset on the relevant transfer date. The analysis applied the statutory definition of capital asset together with the deeming rule for compulsory acquisition, and held that the operative date was the date linked to the acquisition process, not the later date of enhanced compensation. A subsequent notification bringing Kalol within a specified urban area could not change the land&#039;s character retrospectively. The compensation and solatium were therefore not taxable as capital gains, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>