<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 94 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the addition of depreciation to book profit and the non-charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C. The Tribunal found the change in depreciation method permissible under Accounting Standards and not a tax avoidance scheme. It supported the CIT(A)&#039;s stance based on legal provisions and judicial precedents, leading to the appeal&#039;s rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 94 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the addition of depreciation to book profit and the non-charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C. The Tribunal found the change in depreciation method permissible under Accounting Standards and not a tax avoidance scheme. It supported the CIT(A)&#039;s stance based on legal provisions and judicial precedents, leading to the appeal&#039;s rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>