<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55569</link>
    <description>For block assessment purposes, a land transfer was held not taxable in assessment year 1994-95 under section 2(47)(v) or 2(47)(vi) because section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act requires a written contract for part-performance, and mere possession without that requirement was insufficient; the capital gain was therefore treated as assessable in assessment year 1996-97. The land&#039;s 1 April 1981 market value at 3,60,950 was upheld on the approved valuer&#039;s report and tenanting of the land. An enhanced sale consideration based on an unsigned, undated loose sheet from a third party was rejected as a dumb document lacking corroboration; the admitted consideration of 36 lakhs was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55569</link>
      <description>For block assessment purposes, a land transfer was held not taxable in assessment year 1994-95 under section 2(47)(v) or 2(47)(vi) because section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act requires a written contract for part-performance, and mere possession without that requirement was insufficient; the capital gain was therefore treated as assessable in assessment year 1996-97. The land&#039;s 1 April 1981 market value at 3,60,950 was upheld on the approved valuer&#039;s report and tenanting of the land. An enhanced sale consideration based on an unsigned, undated loose sheet from a third party was rejected as a dumb document lacking corroboration; the admitted consideration of 36 lakhs was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>