<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 103 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55561</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, classifying the license premium as business income eligible for deduction under section 80HHC. The disallowance of Rs. 15,000 for residential telephone expenses was upheld, while the disallowance for office telephone expenses was deemed improper. The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding interest charged under section 234B but directed the AO to recalculate it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 103 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55561</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, classifying the license premium as business income eligible for deduction under section 80HHC. The disallowance of Rs. 15,000 for residential telephone expenses was upheld, while the disallowance for office telephone expenses was deemed improper. The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding interest charged under section 234B but directed the AO to recalculate it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>