<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 102 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55544</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for the loss by theft of ornaments, considering it genuine and allowable for the year under appeal. However, the disallowances of labor, traveling, Dharmada, and telephone expenses were upheld as justified by the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=94007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 102 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55544</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for the loss by theft of ornaments, considering it genuine and allowable for the year under appeal. However, the disallowances of labor, traveling, Dharmada, and telephone expenses were upheld as justified by the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>