<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 122 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) for concealment of income, 271(1)(a) for late filing of return, and 273(1)(b) for failure to file an estimate of advance tax. The Tribunal found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars regarding the rate difference issue, determined the late filing was not for a complete month, and concluded the assessee was not obligated to file an estimate of advance tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 122 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) for concealment of income, 271(1)(a) for late filing of return, and 273(1)(b) for failure to file an estimate of advance tax. The Tribunal found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars regarding the rate difference issue, determined the late filing was not for a complete month, and concluded the assessee was not obligated to file an estimate of advance tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>