<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 119 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55480</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal confirming some additions made by the ITO as perquisites like pocket money being taxable, while remanding the issue of tax perquisite back to the CIT(A) for detailed examination of the agreements and actual tax payments. The Tribunal also upheld the direction to grant consequential relief regarding interest charged under section 217.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 119 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55480</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal confirming some additions made by the ITO as perquisites like pocket money being taxable, while remanding the issue of tax perquisite back to the CIT(A) for detailed examination of the agreements and actual tax payments. The Tribunal also upheld the direction to grant consequential relief regarding interest charged under section 217.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>