<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 117 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55470</link>
    <description>Section 263 revisional power was discussed as being unavailable only where the specific matter had already been considered and decided in appeal; a general appellate reference to section 35B did not amount to adjudication of every item falling under that provision, so the export sales commission issue was treated as outside merger. The article also states that commission paid to foreign agents can qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) because maintaining an agency outside India includes an arrangement operating through agents, and the provision was read as an export incentive. On that reasoning, the withdrawal of the deduction was described as unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:14:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 117 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55470</link>
      <description>Section 263 revisional power was discussed as being unavailable only where the specific matter had already been considered and decided in appeal; a general appellate reference to section 35B did not amount to adjudication of every item falling under that provision, so the export sales commission issue was treated as outside merger. The article also states that commission paid to foreign agents can qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) because maintaining an agency outside India includes an arrangement operating through agents, and the provision was read as an export incentive. On that reasoning, the withdrawal of the deduction was described as unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>