<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 79 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55441</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad-A allowed the technician&#039;s appeal, granting full deduction for the daily allowance claimed under section 10(14) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to entertain the additional ground for enhanced deduction, rejecting the Revenue Department&#039;s argument against it. It was held that the allowance received by the technician was not taxable income as per the terms of the agreement and the retrospective amendment was deemed inapplicable. The technician&#039;s living allowance was considered a maintenance allowance and not part of his taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 79 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55441</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad-A allowed the technician&#039;s appeal, granting full deduction for the daily allowance claimed under section 10(14) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to entertain the additional ground for enhanced deduction, rejecting the Revenue Department&#039;s argument against it. It was held that the allowance received by the technician was not taxable income as per the terms of the agreement and the retrospective amendment was deemed inapplicable. The technician&#039;s living allowance was considered a maintenance allowance and not part of his taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>