<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 78 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55434</link>
    <description>Removal of overburden and excavation to expose lignite was treated as an integral part of mining, so the assessee&#039;s activity fell within the statutory meaning of mining under section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1982. It was not necessary that the company also undertake processing of goods. On that basis, the assessee qualified as an industrial company and the tax benefit was allowed, with recomputation directed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:37:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 78 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55434</link>
      <description>Removal of overburden and excavation to expose lignite was treated as an integral part of mining, so the assessee&#039;s activity fell within the statutory meaning of mining under section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1982. It was not necessary that the company also undertake processing of goods. On that basis, the assessee qualified as an industrial company and the tax benefit was allowed, with recomputation directed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>