<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 39 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55413</link>
    <description>Chapter VI-A deductions require prior computation of gross total income under the Act. Unabsorbed depreciation, development rebate and applicable carried-forward losses must therefore be adjusted in computing business income and total income before deduction under section 80P is allowed; relief cannot be granted on income before those adjustments. The section 80P claim was consequently rejected. The section 80J claim, concerning computation of capital employed without deducting liabilities, required reconsideration because the retrospective amendment affecting that provision was pending before the Supreme Court. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision in light of that ruling, resulting in partial allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2024 07:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 39 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55413</link>
      <description>Chapter VI-A deductions require prior computation of gross total income under the Act. Unabsorbed depreciation, development rebate and applicable carried-forward losses must therefore be adjusted in computing business income and total income before deduction under section 80P is allowed; relief cannot be granted on income before those adjustments. The section 80P claim was consequently rejected. The section 80J claim, concerning computation of capital employed without deducting liabilities, required reconsideration because the retrospective amendment affecting that provision was pending before the Supreme Court. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision in light of that ruling, resulting in partial allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>