<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 79 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55398</link>
    <description>Business expenditure is allowable in the year in which the liability crystallises, if the assessee cannot show that the liability was known or ascertainable earlier. On the stated facts, the debit note issued on 31 December 1977 was the first material indicating the liability, and there was no evidence of earlier ascertainment. The expenditure was therefore treated as having crystallised in the relevant previous year and was deductible for the assessment year under consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:09:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 79 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55398</link>
      <description>Business expenditure is allowable in the year in which the liability crystallises, if the assessee cannot show that the liability was known or ascertainable earlier. On the stated facts, the debit note issued on 31 December 1977 was the first material indicating the liability, and there was no evidence of earlier ascertainment. The expenditure was therefore treated as having crystallised in the relevant previous year and was deductible for the assessment year under consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>