<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 109 -  ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55385</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, reversing the AAC&#039;s order disallowing the claim for interest on delayed payment of sales tax, citing conflicting decisions and the debatable nature of the issue. The Tribunal held that as per the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, where two views are possible, the ITO could not have passed an order under section 154 of the IT Act. Therefore, the orders disallowing the claim for interest on delayed payment of sales tax were required to be vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:28:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 109 -  ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55385</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, reversing the AAC&#039;s order disallowing the claim for interest on delayed payment of sales tax, citing conflicting decisions and the debatable nature of the issue. The Tribunal held that as per the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, where two views are possible, the ITO could not have passed an order under section 154 of the IT Act. Therefore, the orders disallowing the claim for interest on delayed payment of sales tax were required to be vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>