<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 112 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55373</link>
    <description>Estate duty was held not leviable where the deceased had no subsisting proprietary or sovereign rights in the Sagbara holdings at death: the post-1948 takeover was treated as an act of state, later governmental correspondence repudiated his ruler status and claims, and the 1958 arrangement created a fresh and different status rather than recognising the earlier estate. The private Dumala villages were likewise treated as repudiated, so no property passed on death. Enhancement was also held unavailable for items not examined in the original assessment, because enhancement cannot introduce new matters for the first time; omitted or deleted items must be pursued by appeal or rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:33:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 112 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55373</link>
      <description>Estate duty was held not leviable where the deceased had no subsisting proprietary or sovereign rights in the Sagbara holdings at death: the post-1948 takeover was treated as an act of state, later governmental correspondence repudiated his ruler status and claims, and the 1958 arrangement created a fresh and different status rather than recognising the earlier estate. The private Dumala villages were likewise treated as repudiated, so no property passed on death. Enhancement was also held unavailable for items not examined in the original assessment, because enhancement cannot introduce new matters for the first time; omitted or deleted items must be pursued by appeal or rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>